Evolution, religion, and ignorance.

[Rampant.A.I.]

I disagree. I quoted TalkOrigins, which is a fairly well-respected site on evolution. IMO an article on TO carries more weight than the opinions of you or Exlax.

It is a newsgroup. It is random people, so you are misguided in thinking there is more credibility there than I or others have.

You have no basis of comparison, you don't actually have any idea of how much people here know because you don't listen.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary...oscales_01

Microevolution happens on a small scale (within a single population), while macroevolution happens on a scale that transcends the boundaries of a single species. Despite their differences, evolution at both of these levels relies on the same, established mechanisms of evolutionary change:
mutation
migration
genetic drift
natural selection

---

First, I said I don't accept macroevolution because I haven't seen compelling scientific evidence. This isn't compelling scientific evidence.

Second, you give a straight-line scenario, yet below acknowledge that changes don't go solidly in one direction.

That's because he's too busy J'O to AiG articles, ignoring the same information every time it's presented to him, and changing lanes without looking while watching Madigascar in his raised truck.