RE: Argument #2: Evolution Of Species
May 9, 2014 at 11:02 am
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2014 at 11:09 am by Chas.)
(May 8, 2014 at 1:04 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:(May 7, 2014 at 5:50 pm)Chas Wrote: Who are you to claim there is a god? Or to assert his characteristics?
Jesus made the claim He is the Son of God.
You're not Jesus.
(May 8, 2014 at 2:25 pm)Confused Ape Wrote:(May 8, 2014 at 1:13 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Talk your mother that died 2 years ago your nuts.
Not if you say you're a Spiritualist. Spiritualism is a recognised religion.
And that somehow makes it not nuts?
(May 9, 2014 at 12:29 am)Revelation777 Wrote:(May 8, 2014 at 1:11 pm)Esquilax Wrote: How do you know Jesus existed?
He lives in my heart.
So do heartworms.
(May 9, 2014 at 12:35 am)Revelation777 Wrote:(May 9, 2014 at 12:00 am)Kitanetos Wrote: Except he never will.
He will come as a thief in the night. Please repent before it is too late.
(May 9, 2014 at 12:12 am)eyemixer Wrote: I am having difficulty understanding what you mean by 'kind' as it is not a scientific term nor have I ever seen it used in a biology course.
Can you explain what you mean by 'kind'? I do not need any fancy language, simply what you understand a 'kind' to mean in your own words.
I am not claiming you are wrong, I just don't understand what you mean by the term and that confusion makes any meaningful conversation impossible, contrary to the goals of a discussion forum I believe.
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
So sharks and whales and cod are all the same 'kind'?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.