(May 9, 2014 at 1:29 pm)alpha male Wrote:(May 9, 2014 at 1:15 pm)Cato Wrote: Nope, just the ones that put your god in the unemployment line.No, just the ones that can't be supported with scientific evidence.
Exlax insists that I don't understand evolution if I reject the claim that evidence for microevolution is necessarily macroevolution, yet we've seen that there are evolutionist scientists who also hold that position.
Some linked to TO's 29 evidences. I showed some of the problems with the first one, and no one has pursued it.
Try cutting the insults and showing the proof.
I thought I pursued it by linking to another article by Theobald which discusses some of the criticisms. I admitted I was being lazy though because I had too much to do that day. Now, please restate your problem with the unity of life for me if you would. I do not understand how the multiple instances of abiogenesis relate to macroevolution or somehow disprove it. I think Theobald makes it clear that the subjects are different. As I said though, maybe I am misunderstanding your problem.
