Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 2, 2025, 9:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Probability of God's existence → zero
#10
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero
(April 26, 2010 at 7:57 am)fr0d0 Wrote: To repeat VOID

The probability of God existing is infinitesimally small, and could be considered impossible.

The probability of people existing is infinitesimally small, and could be considered impossible.

This isn't a convincing argument.

There are two important differences:

1) God is a single entity and 'people' is a collection of entities.

2) The probability of a person existing (like me) has certain definitions. You will need (assuming you can, of course!) find a person with my name, my attributes (such as hair colour etc ...), living in a particular city – London, the fact that I post on atheistforums.org with a particular username etc … some maybe smaller than others but no where near ‘infinitesimal’. There are 6m people living in London (I think!) that is no where near the probability involving the countless entities in the entire universe and the unique attributes such as being the omniscient!











(April 26, 2010 at 7:57 am)Tiberius Wrote:
Quote:Well, since you put on bold Christianity in my example, let's deal with that. There are 22,000+ Christian denominations. The chances that the one a person believes in is right does drop. Also, we're going to have to reduce the probability of each denominations to an equal level, for a lack of evidence. I'll deal with this more below.
So now you are changing your argument? Your original statement was that the chances that a God is the Christian one is small because there are numerous other Gods. Now you are saying that the chances that a person believes in the correct God are smaller. There is a difference...one deals with the personal choice of a person, the other deals with the actual existence of such beings.

No, they're both the same argument. Admittedly, I worded it clumsily there. It is the probability that the Christian God (or whatever) of a certain denomination is true.

Quote:
Quote:I think we fall short of being able to obtain reliable evidence that an entity exists as God.

That's a separate argument. The point is, you cannot simply make the assertion that all God claims are on an equal level. Certainly there is a way of showing that some Gods are more likely that others. If God A has contradicting attributes, and God B and C do not, then Gods B and C are both more likely than God A.

More likely?

We are dealing with infinitesimal chances, for starters.

If God A has contradictory definitions, then it doesn't exist.

Quote:
Quote:The problem here is that there is no calculation where "millions of millions of millions" is possible

Erm...yes there is. 1,000,000 x 1,000,000 x 1,000,000. Millions of millions of millions. Otherwise known as a quintillion.

Quote:but as some able mathematician I am alarmed you think an infinitesimal amount is "a very actual and measurable amount". In statistics, it is insignificant.
I don't. That was in reference to the "1 in millions of millions of millions", which is an actual and measurable amount.

Quote:1) "millions of millions of millions" is synonym for the countless number of entities.
Not really, especially not in statistics. If you want to say "countless" then say it.

This is bordering on pedantry.

I am dealing with ALL the entities in the universe. Obviously, people use millions of millions in very day speech to convey ‘countlessness’ and not "1,000,000 x 1,000,000 x 1,000,000". That's no-where near enough! After all, it is countless!

Quote:
Quote:2) It is the infinitesimal probability raised to the power of as many definitions we place on God. So, it becomes inconceivably infinitesimal.
Again, based on faulty statistics. You could apply this to anything and say that everything is inconceivable. There are an infinite number of things that could happen when you toss a coin, so the result of a toin coss is inconceivable. Of course, most of those things are infinitesimally small, but two of them (i.e. it landing heads or tails) are very much more probable to occur.

I am genuinely confused and don’t really understand what you’re trying to say. There are several issues:

Firstly, when one toss a coin, it can land on heads, or tails - both of which make P(coin landing on either heads or tails) = 0.5. There are other possibilities. It could, for instance, sink through the floor. The chances of that happen are so insignificant that we disregard it and count it as zero. Now, 0.5 is very measurable.

Secondly, one must be careful using "infinitesimal". I was careful in selecting it. It is a measure denoted to something that is "so small that there is no way to see them or to measure them". So the it really won't apply to a probability that is 0.5 !

Thirdly, and I'm not sure you're saying this but tossing a coin and landing on either heads OR tails is a single probability. The probability of the existence of God is a satisfaction of all the definitions that need to be satisfied. Thus, it would need to satisfy all the probabilities. So they depend on each other.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Probability of God's existence → zero - by Fluké - April 26, 2010 at 4:05 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by theVOID - April 26, 2010 at 4:26 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by Fluké - April 26, 2010 at 5:30 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by Tiberius - April 26, 2010 at 6:32 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by Fluké - April 26, 2010 at 6:50 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by Tiberius - April 26, 2010 at 7:11 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by Fluké - April 26, 2010 at 7:37 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by Tiberius - April 26, 2010 at 7:57 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by fr0d0 - April 26, 2010 at 7:57 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by Fluké - April 26, 2010 at 8:08 am
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by fr0d0 - April 26, 2010 at 3:31 pm
RE: Probability of God's existence → zero - by theVOID - April 26, 2010 at 5:01 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 9437 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  10 Syllogistic arguments for Gods existence Otangelo 84 16847 January 14, 2020 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Quantum Physics Proves God’s Existence blue grey brain 15 2972 January 2, 2019 at 11:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why are you chasing the idea of the existence of a God? WinterHold 26 4953 August 7, 2018 at 2:05 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  11-Year-Old College Grad Wants to Pursue Astrophysics to Prove God’s Existence Silver 49 10412 August 2, 2018 at 4:51 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  So can god end his own existence? Vast Vision 53 18367 July 27, 2017 at 1:51 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  What self-subsists, maximum or minimal existence? Mystic 19 3246 March 16, 2017 at 2:51 am
Last Post: masterofpuppets
  Q about arguments for God's existence. Mudhammam 579 197291 October 25, 2016 at 10:00 am
Last Post: Little Rik
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 102993 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  The Oncological Argument against the existence of God Alex K 49 15003 December 25, 2015 at 7:55 am
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)