(May 11, 2014 at 3:35 pm)RDK Wrote: A living cell is required to have a collective, communicative cooperation of all of it's parts functioning together to provide for it's (symbiotic), life providing relationship to occur. In order for future alterations to occur (future animal designs), extra parts that are under consideration would have to be attached to this creature for use at a later time.
"Under consideration," seriously? You do understand that even really small, simplistic changes can still have a use to the organism, right? The eye started out as a patch of slightly light sensitive cells, and evolved over millions of years into what we have today; it's not a matter of the eye being totally non-functional right up until the moment that it fully transitions into being a human eye. Where would you ever get the idea that it would be that way?
Quote: Does the animal know what these parts will be, as they should have some appropriate rightful fitment within the integrity of the creature. If this is the way that animals change, then we should all have hundreds of experimental appendages all over us as these chance extra parts make their way into our future life.
We might just, you know: who knows what future purpose vestigial organs like the appendix may serve? See, that's the problem, you're (dishonestly) looking for, like, extra fingers or something, when you've been told the changes will always be gradual.
Quote: Do you think that extra time is all that's required for these things to finally find their way onto a completed animal. NO WAY!
What do you mean, "completed animal"? Every animal is a complete creature, and every animal is undergoing evolution. It's not like there was ever half a dog that had to evolve all the pieces of a dog together and then pop, it was a dog. No, prior, equally complete organisms (wolves, in this case) gradually altered over generations into the dogs we know today.
You do understand that doing what you're doing, when you haven't even so much as looked at the wikipedia entry for evolution, is tantamount to lying, right? You do get that?
Quote: Time is not a variable for the design of creatures.
It is, in that time is what it takes to breed.
Quote: Most every animal is fully complete to use every available part to it's fullest advantage.
Fullest advantage? Your spinal nerves beg to differ; they're the spinal nerves of a quadrupedal animal.
Moreover, evolution never, ever said there would be a half creature. It fully acknowledges that each animal is a complete animal, just one that can vary gradually into something else.
Quote: Not only are we considering the modification of individual body parts, but we have to consider all of the "hard-wiring" of these components parts as well. There would have to be constant planning for connections such as nerve networks, blood supply, waste removal, regeneration of damaged tissues, inter-cellular communication, ETC.ETC.
Yet more unjustified anthropomorphizing: "Planning."

Quote: To imagine that non-intelligent elements gathered themselves together with order to form anything at all makes no sense. The number of useful connections between these things would be truly astronomical, and this all happened by chance? NO WAY!!!
Argument from incredulity. You also understand that most of the species on earth are extinct, right? And beyond that, the number of individual offspring that die, taking their evolutionary changes to the grave, is many orders of magnitude more? Nobody ever said that evolution gets it right every time, you cretin.
Now shut the hell up before you embarrass yourself even more, if that's possible.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!