If odds are so far against the chance production of life by accident, why not consider an alternate. I have not tried to fill you with religious ideas at all, just trying to refute ideas which have no useful place in science.
I believe that animals change for a reason, to improve their useful life here on this planet. If life is something beyond just a collection of physical parts, then we have to pursue that in a non-mechanical way. Is there intelligence which directs outcomes, or is life just a combination of mistakes with a profitable result? The odds against accident is so overwhelming that I gave up that useless method. I began to ask that intelligence what it is doing and I got answers. If you have not tried another way, you will not see the sense of trying. I am not angry at any of you for the challenges I have given. I didn't think that I would get a happy response-I am challenging all of your previously valued beliefs. I am excited that I get a chance to share a new way of analyzing information. Odds are in your favor that you will get the same results I have.
I believe that animals change for a reason, to improve their useful life here on this planet. If life is something beyond just a collection of physical parts, then we have to pursue that in a non-mechanical way. Is there intelligence which directs outcomes, or is life just a combination of mistakes with a profitable result? The odds against accident is so overwhelming that I gave up that useless method. I began to ask that intelligence what it is doing and I got answers. If you have not tried another way, you will not see the sense of trying. I am not angry at any of you for the challenges I have given. I didn't think that I would get a happy response-I am challenging all of your previously valued beliefs. I am excited that I get a chance to share a new way of analyzing information. Odds are in your favor that you will get the same results I have.
