RE: Evolution, religion, and ignorance.
May 11, 2014 at 7:14 pm
(This post was last modified: May 11, 2014 at 7:17 pm by Chas.)
(May 11, 2014 at 6:46 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Still, you fail to grasp the enormity enormous magnitude of the numbers we're dealing with, here.
You wouldn't have had just one single initial self replicating organic compound... you'd get... Avogadro's constant of them.
But you speak of animals... which just says you don't know anything, nor have you given it any honest thought...
e·nor·mi·ty iˈnôrmitē/
noun
- the great or extreme scale, seriousness, or extent of something perceived as bad or morally wrong.
- a grave crime or sin.
You're welcome. -the grammar commissar
![[Image: GrammarCommie.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.acbeddoe.com%2Fphotos%2Fatheism%2FGrammarCommie.gif)
(May 11, 2014 at 7:05 pm)RDK Wrote: Randomness just creates more randomness. It's kind of like watching the TV after all the broadcasters have signed off for the night. You see the TV snow which is just equal amounts of white and black bouncing around all over the screen. You can watch this for all eternity, and you never see one good program. You can increase the size of the screen but the randomness just gets greater.
If you see life around here, it's not because of random chance. You belief that through unproven methods of observation. You were told that this method makes sense, so, you believe it. The scientists have had to take a leap of faith in order to assume that we all came about by accident. You will not accept a single facet of an opposing viewpoint because you are close-minded. Don't get upset if I state the obvious.
Randomness is an interesting topic, but evolution by natural selection is not random.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.