RE: Jesus should have been a king.
May 14, 2014 at 9:34 pm
(This post was last modified: May 14, 2014 at 9:56 pm by Violet.)
(May 14, 2014 at 9:15 pm)Chad32 Wrote: If he really wanted to make the world a better place, and spread his beliefs, then being in a position of power would be the most ideal way to do it. It seems like the only point in him being born in a feeding trough and all that was to show how humble he was. except then his followers equate him to Yahweh, who was anything but humble.
How would being a king have not helped immensely? Why wasn't he born in a position where he could actually enact laws, instead of just preach the word?
It's awful self-righteous to preach to the poor and the downtrodden from a position of power.
"One of us. One of us. One of us."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ekd2-4vH1Tc
(May 14, 2014 at 9:24 pm)Ksa Wrote: Jesus is a bastard. His mother spread legs for someone else and came up with...a bullshit story. It came from God. Sure, and I'm fucking Santa Claus.
If the husband believes this, then I cannot disagree with the decision to make love to another.
If the husband needs to protect his wife, it is a fairly mediocre method to say it came from anyone but himself.
If the parents (husband and/or wife) want to create a scandal/social recognition of the child: claiming they came from 'God', and that it is a virgin birth, are both somewhat effective.
Quote:It's like getting caught with 10Kg of methamphetamine today and say God gave it to you. If only someone killed her...all this non-sense would not have existed. I don't care about anybody, I don't care that my son has to bear the burden of being the "son of God" I don't care that he died because I was a whore. I only care about me.
And what of the skeptics if you are right?
Sure... forgotten, as yet another story takes hold. If a populace can be overcome by a story: it means the populace is prone to such a whim.
Everyone dies, broski... the status of their mother's sex life notwithstanding.
Quote:What a cock sucking mother that must have been.
I don't recall any evidence that Mary, mother of Jesus, ever once put her lips to a cock.... so 'must have' is naught more than conjecture.
Not that I don't find this entire post utterly abhorable... but leveling such undeserving blame at a largely irrelevant character (of which few details are writ) strongly resembles witchslaying fanaticism.
And suppose she was inclined towards those 'slutty' deeds with which you find such contention: what does it bloody matter?
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
