(May 14, 2014 at 10:32 pm)RDK Wrote: The fact that I'm finding faults in the compilation of information called evolution is only because there are so many faults to be found. Rather than repeat over and over that I have no concepts worthy of your acceptance, lets try a simpler approach.
Consider again the idea of the first mating pair. There had to be a first one at some time, right. If you say no to this, you have no reason to try to diminish someone who is trying to reason. Can you define the first pair bonding arrangement in simple clear terms, and not try to hide behind what you believe to be scientific progress. Somewhere in time a first mating pair meet, be it cell or whatever. Your difficulty will be to explain in simple terms, the immense number of transitions that an organism would have to make to meet and connect with anything closely resembling itself. And you know that this connection can only happen if the two cells are similar to each other to begin with. Where did the differences come from. It's those differences that make cellular advancement in this way totally impossible. You don't need a degree in science to see how impossible something is.
Surely you noticed during all your "research" that cells don't need mates to replicate before spouting your bullshit, yes?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
