Evolution, religion, and ignorance.
May 17, 2014 at 3:08 pm
(This post was last modified: May 17, 2014 at 3:14 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(May 17, 2014 at 1:50 pm)RDK Wrote: Has someone implied that a vestigial appendage is some sort of evidence of upward evolution? What about the seeming leg remnants in a whale. Have you seen any walking whales in history?
Well yes, that's exactly why they have leg remnants.
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary...vograms_03
(May 17, 2014 at 2:57 pm)RDK Wrote: If I have found problems with the understanding of "accidental" evolution, it's because it has within it huge holes that need to be filled. If coming to conclusions about these these discrepancies is difficult, try to fill those holes yourself and admit that they are there. You keep quoting from the evolution bible and you're unwilling to take on it's inconsistencies.
What evolution bible? You think there's a single book that contains the theory?
Quote:The vast majority of the scientific community and academia supports evolutionary theory as the only explanation that can fully account for observations in the fields of biology, paleontology, molecular biology, genetics, anthropology, and others.[19][20][21][22][23] One 1987 estimate found that "700 scientists ... (out of a total of 480,000 U.S. earth and life scientists) ... give credence to creation-science".[24] An expert in the evolution-creationism controversy, professor and author Brian Alters, states that "99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution".[25] A 1991 Gallup poll found that about 5% of American scientists (including those with training outside biology) identified themselves as creationists.[26][27]
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_..._evolution
All of these scientists publish for peer review.
Projection is a helluva drug.