(June 20, 2014 at 11:05 am)bennyboy Wrote: There are many good arguments to be made, but this is not one of them. Law has nothing to do with moral arguments, except if you are arguing that breaking a law is intrinsically immoral. And you are not making that argument.
OK but even if you do not like that definition, which seems clear to me , the big questions still remain for our friend Heywood to answer:
Would he take away a woman's right to abort an unwanted baby?
If he thinks yes I would like him to justify why.
It's not immoral to eat meat, abort a fetus or love someone of the same sex...I think that about covers it
