(June 25, 2014 at 11:29 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: You're still missing the point. If the Milky Way Galaxy is 13.2 billion years old that means that it's about the same age of the Universe, according to a popular theory. Some people conclude that the Universe is 13.7 billion years old based on the speed of light from the most distant galaxies. So you have a paradox. If the farthest object is 13.7 billion years away and it's fully formed as a galaxy would you have been able to have seen it 13.2 billion years ago from the Milky Way? Remember, such objects are all around us so it's just not one object that we're talking about.
Don't forget: there are countless galaxies between us and the farthest ones.
So what do you think?
You're missing the point.
The galaxy that now appears to be 13.7 billion years away, appears as it did 13.7 billion years ago from our frame of reference. It's actually been receding away from the milky way, and is now substantially farther away (on the order of 46+ billion light years).
You're going to have to connect the dots, because whatever it is you're attempting to illustrate makes zero sense.