A Tulsa newspaper seems to regard the issue in much the same way as Maddow.
http://m.tulsaworld.com/news/government/...l?mode=jqm
What a bill's sponsors claim its intent is and what it actually is are two wildly differing things.
Especially when two flat out republibertarianeo-conazis like the Koch Brothers have their greasy, greedy, little mitts all over it.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-sola...tml#page=1
http://m.tulsaworld.com/news/government/...l?mode=jqm
Quote:The bill says its intent is to assure that "customers with distributed generation" are not "subsidized by customers in the same class of service who do not have distributed generation."
The subsidy referred to is access to the power grid without paying the full cost of that access.
Some, though, think the bill is a pre-emptive strike by the utilities against a small but burgeoning alternative energy industry.
What a bill's sponsors claim its intent is and what it actually is are two wildly differing things.
Especially when two flat out republibertarianeo-conazis like the Koch Brothers have their greasy, greedy, little mitts all over it.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-sola...tml#page=1
Quote:Solar, once almost universally regarded as a virtuous, if perhaps over-hyped, energy alternative, has now grown big enough to have enemies.
The Koch brothers, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist and some of the nation's largest power companies have backed efforts in recent months to roll back state policies that favor green energy. The conservative luminaries have pushed campaigns in Kansas, North Carolina and Arizona, with the battle rapidly spreading to other states.
