RE: Can Someone be Simply "An Agnostic?"
June 27, 2014 at 7:45 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2014 at 7:49 pm by Simon Moon.)
(June 27, 2014 at 7:24 pm)ManMachine Wrote: Yes, a person can be 'just an agnostic'.
I (and most here) would disagree.
Quote:Atheist - someone who asserts deities do not exist
Nope.
Atheist - the lack of belief in gods. SOME atheists may assert that gods do not exist, but that is not atheism in general.
Quote:Agnostic - someone who asserts that the truth about such things is unknown or unknowable
This is a position that addresses what claims are unknown or unknowable. It does not address belief, which is what atheism/theism address.
Quote:Theist - someone who asserts deities exist
Not all theists make that assertion. Many do not claim to know, with absolute certainty, that a god exists.
Quote:A theist may claim they know god exists, an atheist may claim they know god does not exist, an agnostic may claim that such things are unknowable.
None of these, including the agnostic, has the reasonable authority to assume their position is universally true.
They can exist alone or in blends.
Belief is defined by cognitive scientists as - The psychological state in which one accepts a premise to be true.
Belief is a binary mental state. Either one accepts the premise that a god exists (believes), or they don't (atheism).
There is the set of of all people that accept the premise that a god exists to be true. These are theists.
Everyone else is an atheist.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.