RE: Abortion is morally wrong
July 1, 2014 at 3:56 pm
(This post was last modified: July 1, 2014 at 3:59 pm by Dystopia.)
(July 1, 2014 at 3:48 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote:(July 1, 2014 at 2:47 pm)blackout94 Wrote: I didn't say abortion was skyrocketing in portugal, I just said some women are using it wrongly, abortion should be a last resort, not a contraceptive measure, at least they should pay out of their pockets to incentive them to not use abortion like this. I never compared portugal with the UK or any other country, but recent statistics showed one or two years after legalization abortions per women increased, considering we are in a crisis and few people have means to provide for a full family this is justified.
(bold mine)
Who are you to decide how women should use abortion? It's none of your business. Even if it's a tax thing, people bring lung cancer on themselves. Should they pay out-of-pocket for their treatments? How about diabetics? People who broke a leg in a motorcycle accident?
Also, you're going to have to cite your sources if you want us to believe abortions increased. I simply don't believe you. I had to have an abortion once (I had a dead fetus that didn't want to leave naturally), and it was probably the most physically painful thing I've ever experienced. Do you really think women WANT to have abortions?
Your lines of reasoning have been debunked several times in this thread, among countless other abortion threads on this forum. I understand you're (sort of) pro choice, but you sound a lot like someone who isn't.
Firstly I'm no one to decide on how women should use abortions neither did I intend to control such choice, I'm sorry if I didn't express myself correctly. However, I'm not sure whether abortion is cheaper or contraceptives. If contraceptives are cheaper then I have the right to demand my state funds education and contraceptives to prevent increase in abortion rate.
If you can read in portuguese, I can quote you several studies and statistics that show evidence, the main factor for abortion increasing being the financial/economical crisis, I have no need to check studies in english since in my country we use our language and our institute of statistics is a lot closer to our social reality compared to a foreign institute.
I believe you when you say aborting was the most painful thing you ever done and I don't think women enjoy doing abortions as an hobby.
To finish, I never really argued as either pro choice or pro life completely, I simply stated abortion is still ethically an inner debate and I have not yet decided myself on it, I have this right and if I were asked to vote for complete legalization I would probably abstain.
(July 1, 2014 at 3:26 pm)Bibliofagus Wrote: @blackout:
I tried quoting the pile above but I couldn't figure out how to correctly do it. First of all: thank you for your answer. I think I see were you are coming from. I have a problem however.
You've posted that only 50% or something of your people bothered to even turn up the day they could have made abortion illegal. Then you said that funding for contraception would be too expensive for your people ever to want to fund. I'm guessing that means you think they would turn up in bigger numbers and vote it away as well.
But abortions are not only more expensive, but also a - lot - more controversial than contraception. Yet you appear to believe that state funded contraception is unattainable in Portugal while state funded abortion was democratically voted into law.
How come?
It was democratically voted because only pro choice people who want the right to abort bothered to show up, pro lifers, the majority of the population just thought 'YES will never win this referendum so I'm not going to show up'. And we voted to legalize abortion, not to make it illegal, it was illegal, but to make it legal according to the mother's will. (I didn't vote because I was a minor)
Contraceptives are not subjected to referendum therefore people had no saying in it, and most are too stupid to even realize contraceptives are cheaper than contraception, most people would vote yes if asked 'Should the government raise expenses on public hospitals?' and no when asked 'Should the state raise taxes?' (In this last case, it would be necessary to invest more in public hospitals) - See the stupidity?
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you