(July 1, 2014 at 2:47 pm)blackout94 Wrote: I'm not saying all pro lifers agree with these 3 exceptions
Except that you did in the post I was responding to:
Post #502 on page 51 of this thread:
Quote:Well it's still a though question to decide when we can consider an unborn child a human, this is why I can't take a position. I'll be pro choice, then, sounds more reasonable. I think all pro lifers will agree with me that any women should be able to abort in case of rape, life endangering or malformation of the fetus, these are cases that even anti abortion legislation allow frequently since they are the exception and not the norm.
Which was the line I bolded in my post and the whole reason I even responded to it. You said that you thought ALL pro-lifers would agree that there should be rape, life-endangerment and malformation exceptions to abortion bans and I demonstrated that ALL pro-lifers definitely DO NOT agree with you.
Quote:Even my girlfriend, a militant pro lifer agrees perfectly that these 3 exceptions should be allowed.
Your girlfriend is not representative of all pro-lifers.
Before you make absolute claims like "all of [anybody] says or does [X]" do a little research, or be more cautious and use words like "many" or "most" instead of "all."
Quote:One thing everybody should remember is that there is always a general rule AND exceptions, exceptions exist because they are different cases that require different treatment
Try explaining this to Todd Akin.
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.
