(July 2, 2014 at 5:06 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(July 2, 2014 at 4:58 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I still don't agree with your point. This isn't a club of a hobby that someone might find objectionable. This is standards of healthcare, something that we need. A service that's as vital as medicine needs to have strict standards that everyone operating in the field needs to follow. I still don't think you can compare medicine to any sort of objectionable club or organization. I'd even go so far as to say it's unique in its neccesity, and thus needs strongly observed standards.b-mine.
There are unspoken assumptions here, and out of hand dismissals of any other alternative. I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm asking you to apply your argument -in favor- of something objectionable, and then tell us what you think. It's a thought experiment.
I don't understand how it's relevant?
We need doctors. Everyone. All of society. They must be required to drop their personal issues at the door and do their jobs. It's a necessity. Otherwise people would be dying left and right as doctors are refusing to help them if they were injured while doing something the doctors find morally objectionable.
This type of requirement doesn't apply to anything outside of doctors that I can think of.
I just don't get where you are going with this.