(July 5, 2014 at 2:33 pm)Irrational Wrote:(July 5, 2014 at 2:29 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Ras is drawing authority from -the- authority on the subject...that which is clearly delineated as a legal right. This is akin to asking someone what authority they have to call an argument irrational.
You do realize rights differ with nation, right? Rights are not fixed in stone.
So maybe, there are no such thing as "made up rights".

You were the person who implied that rights of conscience should be subservient to other rights. If you can't think up a legitimate example for it, that's not my problem.
(July 5, 2014 at 1:06 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(July 5, 2014 at 12:55 am)Irrational Wrote: I don't value religious (or some other) rights if they get in the way of other rights that I consider with good reason to be of more value.
. . . .
If you think all types of rights are to be considered equal level, you think that isn't a dangerous thing to espouse? Yours is black and white thinking: it's either right or not. I find that more dangerous than what I believe in.
I believe I've asked how someone else's rights to live according to their conscience interferes with your rights. How might that occur? I'll grant as a given that one's right to swing one's fist ends at another's face. Please, let's have some examples where one person's exercise of right of conscience might interfere with another's rights.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)