@Godslayer
-That's kind of a silly argument.
It's not for a man that fights for human rights in general but feels that he's not obligated to talk about abortion because he's not a woman. Yet he defends homosexuals and blacks under racial abuse.
So, under his logic, you need to be a woman to have a fair talk on abortion, but you don't have to be gay to defend the rights of the homosexual population, and you also don't need to be black to defend the rights of blacks.
How wrong can he be?
-That's kind of a silly argument.
It's not for a man that fights for human rights in general but feels that he's not obligated to talk about abortion because he's not a woman. Yet he defends homosexuals and blacks under racial abuse.
So, under his logic, you need to be a woman to have a fair talk on abortion, but you don't have to be gay to defend the rights of the homosexual population, and you also don't need to be black to defend the rights of blacks.
How wrong can he be?