RE: Abortion is morally wrong
July 30, 2014 at 7:18 am
(This post was last modified: July 30, 2014 at 7:28 am by answer-is-42.)
(July 30, 2014 at 1:32 am)Rhythm Wrote: To reiterate, Mr. Literacy.......I think you're misusing the term. You seem to be thinking of a fetus as a moral subject.Agreed I misused the term, correction appreciated. However still a little pedantic and does not really address the nature of my question. I will change my terminology in the future
(July 30, 2014 at 2:10 am)whateverist Wrote:Not really sure what you are talking about. If you feel a fetus is not a moral SUBJECT then fine my arguement does not stand on its own. As I have already conceded, this is more a question for those who do accept the premise by feel that a woman's autonomy trumps, like a continue to say. Please read my statements. I'm genuinely trying to have a rational discussion but the internet keeps proving that the lowest common denominator wins out(July 30, 2014 at 1:32 am)Rhythm Wrote: To reiterate, Mr. Literacy.......I think you're misusing the term. You seem to be thinking of a fetus as a moral subject.
Yeah the little buggers ought to organize and publish a manifesto. As soon as I get a copy I'll take their stake in all this a hell of a lot more seriously. In the meantime I'd suggest that those who have no standing in the decision but still feel distraught find a way to chill out.
Also, if he requirement to publish a manifesto is a requirement for human rights as you imply or to be a moral subject, then does any group that cannot not have these rights or be considered a moral subject? Is that a required part of te criteria? If not then how bout you chill out and try to be consistent and if it is then please justify why a person in a coma, under anesthesia , Etc loses their status