(December 23, 2008 at 7:20 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:(December 21, 2008 at 9:52 am)leo-rcc Wrote: Allow me to blatantly spam in return: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/...-Islam.htmInteresting site!
I've long felt that it was utter b******** to refer to Islam as "the religion of peace" (though to "balance" that I feel much the same about Christianity) and I genuinely don't know if this site is as objective as it purports to be, I suspect there may be a slight US right-wing bias (not sure).
Well that is the point really. Everyone can cherry-pick good and bad things out of every scripture and interpret it the way it suits either the proponents or the debunkers.
Bias or not, so far every but of scripture they came up with in their refutations is indeed as it is written in the Hadith and Quran. The fact we can discuss its interpretation already suggests that these texts are far from divine inspiration. The same is true for the Bible and the Torah.
(December 23, 2008 at 7:20 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: Nevertheless it is interesting to hear a POV that doesn't appear to be promoting hatred but doesn't buy into the politically correct view that Islam is peaceful. More interestingly, this kind of site would be banned if what I understand is being proposed by the UN is adopted by countries around the world.
The list of Islamic terror events is simply staggering.
I am sorry to say I have to agree with you. Islam has the best of three worlds. It's a religion when it wants it to be, it's a lifestyle when it wants it to be, and its a race when it wants it to be. And it is protected under all three guises.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
