it's a valid question.
We, you and he and I, could be wrong. We should accept that we could be wrong, because it is not that you beleive in god that makes you an idiot (although Dawkins may tell you so), it is in fact the belief that you are right and everyone else is wrong. I accept that I may be wrong. I beleive very much, but I may be wrong. Atheism 2.0, the mean and full of itself atheism, is apparently in possession of some level of truth that everyone else on the planet is without...
The world would be a better place without that man making a generation of self aggrandizing and socially illiterate monkeys.
It;s a valid question, one he should have answered in a wholly different manner.
We, you and he and I, could be wrong. We should accept that we could be wrong, because it is not that you beleive in god that makes you an idiot (although Dawkins may tell you so), it is in fact the belief that you are right and everyone else is wrong. I accept that I may be wrong. I beleive very much, but I may be wrong. Atheism 2.0, the mean and full of itself atheism, is apparently in possession of some level of truth that everyone else on the planet is without...
The world would be a better place without that man making a generation of self aggrandizing and socially illiterate monkeys.
It;s a valid question, one he should have answered in a wholly different manner.
