RE: Dawkins sparks outrage for saying Down Syndrome babies should be aborted
August 24, 2014 at 7:30 pm
(This post was last modified: August 24, 2014 at 7:48 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(August 24, 2014 at 8:25 am)Napoléon Wrote: Tbh in the whole "handicapped" versus "disabled", I don't see why disabled is a better term to use, maybe someone could explain. In both terms you know what the person means and the intent is not to offend.
Exactly. A person can be insulting without using any disreputable verbiage whatsoever, too. Words aren't innately good or bad ... but human emotions are.
(August 24, 2014 at 8:33 am)Aractus Wrote:(August 24, 2014 at 8:22 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: DS sufferers have objective metrics demonstrating lower cognitive ability.Lower cognitive abilities than who? Non-disabled people who've since suffered severe brain damage in a car accident??
Than the average person, of course.
Also, I've got a family member who is employed rehabilitating a TBI patient. Saying that her patient isn't disabled doesn't make sense; a TBI patient is almost always disabled.
Are you really thinking your position through? I'm not trying to be argumentative, but your analogy doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Rather than defend it with special pleading, would not the discussion be advanced by simply acknowledging its weakness and trying to find some other, less flawed way to express your obviously strong feelings about the matter?
(August 24, 2014 at 9:01 am)pocaracas Wrote: Why knowingly bring forth into this world a child who will never be an adult? a child who will always require care by other people? A child which will always be a burden? A child which will have no independence, no freedom?
The moral choice should be the choice which brings the best for society... so I'd say Dawkins seems right, here...
One of my first jobs was at a shitty fast-food joint. I had a co-worker named Doug who was DS, high-functioning, and could do most any job in the store. He was a genuinely funny and good guy. I've run into him again from time to time, and as the years have passed he's gotten some independence (had his own apartment the last I saw him).
He taught me a hell of a lot about my own prejudices, and how I could be a more thoughtful person.
I don't think a person's worth boils down to such bald economic terms, myself.
(August 24, 2014 at 11:52 am)Losty Wrote:(August 24, 2014 at 12:57 am)Aractus Wrote:
No one told you not to use them, but your use of them is childish and annoying. I lived in South Georgia for 7 years hearing racial slurs was a daily part of my life. As well as witnessing first hand some pretty sick things done by racist horrible people. (Like the beating of a black kid for dating a white girl at my highschool. He was in the icu for a week). It's tragic and sad and it needs to be changed. So I will return your fuck you. Fuck you for joining the ignorant in their racism (regardless of whether or not you're actually racist), and becoming a part of the problem instead of a part of the change.
Hear, hear.
(August 24, 2014 at 6:53 pm)Aractus Wrote: No you're not getting it. My point is that judging others for their congestive ability, or generally just for being "not normal" is not healthy for society.
It is not a "judgment". It is an analysis of the facts at hand.
Also, it doesn't really have any social ramifications to say, "DS sufferers typically average lower intelligence", because that analysis makes no prescriptive admonishment. Now, if I said, "DS sufferers typically average lower intelligence, so let's discriminate against them," you'd have a point.
But I didn't, and you don't.