Brown and the word "robbery".....

[Brakeman]

Here's the autopsy sketch by the Family's ME.

Still two shots to the head. And the hits to the arm, as their expert said, could be facing away or facing the cop. Still consistent with giving up. Witnesses said he fired while Brown ran. Why stop running if you were not hit from behind, arm or back? If I got hit by a bullet I would stop running. Take into account the witnesses saying he tried to give up, and the hit to the crown of his head was the last shot.

OH and those "entry" wounds to the arm hit him while he was running away, your arms do not stay lowered like that when you are running, any time racing on a track team you'd know that. Those "entry wounds" still can be consistent with facing away with his hands up.

You are assuming the pictures depiction which is not the the reality of how the arms in reality move. That is a stationary 2 dimensional drawing. Move your arms in reality you can be in a very consistent position of what the witnesses said.

Geeze! The wounds do NOT match with the evidence at all. Your claims of his arms being hit from the front because his hands were up and brown was facing away from the cop, are not only ridiculous on the face but because Michael was 6'4" and the cop would at most be shooting from his eye level, then the bullet trajectories would be angled up, and the muscle tissue layers would reveal that the arm was outstretched when it was pierced. We haven't this kind of detail from the ME's office yet, but that will decide it on the only two shots that could have possibly followed your idea that his arms were hit while he was facing away from the cop.
I'd LOVE to bet you on this one.

The thumb injury cannot be made while the hands are in the air, and the uppermost arm injury where it grazes his chest cannot be made with his hands in the air.

In your scenario the first two shots would have hit Brown while he was running away with his hands up, Then the cop paused while Brown turned around and lowered his hands. When they were down, the cop winked at him and started to fire again, hitting him in the thumb and upper arm, which are the two arm wounds that couldn't be hit with his hands up. Then, according to your story, Brown decided to bow over to allow the cop to shoot him in the eyebrow and top of the head, killing him.

One of the problems with your scenario is that it doesn't match any of the witnesses.

Now look how the evidence fits the copy story as told by the friend.
Tussle at the car, cop gets roughed up, Brown tries to leave, cop regains footing and orders brown to freeze. Brown turns around and charges the cop so the cop unloads on him.
In this scenario all of the bullets hit from the front (check) in the position of a running man all with similar bullet trajectories. (Check)

All without having brown becoming a contortionist or a ballet dancer and without the cop deciding to give pause in the shooting while a 300 lbs Brown turns around and lowers his arms. It's a bitch how that fits isn't it?

The arm wounds were not enough to drop him to the ground anyway, thus the two head shots could only have come from a charging Brown as he wouldn't have fallen to the ground from the arm wounds.

Your reluctance to follow the evidence and stick with your racial preconceptions reminds me of the white juries of Mississippi in the '50s. No amount of obvious evidence could convince them either.

Just because you are a white cop in a black neighborhood doesn't mean you harbor enough hate for black men that you would kill one execution style while they are surrendering. You are making a hell of a huge racist claim to believe that.