Thanks Esquilax,
I think I'd probably be repeating myself in replying to most of those points, so I'll leave things as they stand. I did want to pick up on just one point though. You said....
I see no reason why stable morality can't be the product of a law giver. Indeed I would expect a stable law giver to give a stable law; that makes more sense to me than capriciousness.
I think I'd probably be repeating myself in replying to most of those points, so I'll leave things as they stand. I did want to pick up on just one point though. You said....
Quote:But in a world where the moral system cannot be changed even by the being whom you believe created that system, then evidently the system and determinations therein are not a product of the law giver
I see no reason why stable morality can't be the product of a law giver. Indeed I would expect a stable law giver to give a stable law; that makes more sense to me than capriciousness.