Abortion is morally wrong

[Losty]

Finally to losty. Thank you for actually addressing the arguement at hand. I think you have a misunderstanding about my entire arguement and structure. I may be because I was not clear or you may have misunderstood. Regardless let me try again...
I agree with your first assumption that a fetus is a moral subject so let's move from there.

I just want to clarify that this is not my assumption. This is an allowance I am making for you to be able to make your argument based on this assumption.

If you willingly take an action that you know or should know can have a repercussion on another subject then I beleive that it is immoral to not take responsibility for that consequence (double negative, I know sorry, late and can't quite figure out a more clear messsage at this time)
[fixt :p]
. So if you willingly have sex with the knowledge that sex can cause pregnancy then you have by virtue of your action morally accepted that responsibility (remember a whole bunch of pages back the example of the rich guy and the kidney?) The subject of your responsibility then becomes the fetus that you (and a sperm donor of some sort) created. That is responsibility portion of my arguement and is the main counter to the my body, my choice arguement because I am arguing that by willingly and knowingly engaging in sex you have willingly and knowingly accepted the responsibility for that action.

I am with you so far.

The next part (which I also previously outlined seperately) is what type of action consitutes responsibility? IF you agree that the fetus is a subject then destroying the subject is not in my estimation demonstrating any more responsiblility then (and as I said previously I am not equating abortion to murder, this is ONLY an EXAMPLE) killing someone (also a moral subject) because you broke their arm - yes the issue (broken arm) is taken care of, but how is this a remedy to the affected subject?

If you could actually say what you mean with out all the extra stuff it would be easier for me to respond.
Example:"The next part is what type of action consitutes responsibility? If you agree that the fetus is a moral subject then destroying the subject is not in my estimation demonstrating responsibility."

To which I would respond, why not? If you can, answer this question directly without making any examples from irrelevant, separate circumstances like broken arms or windows.

In the case of the fetus, I would say it is reasonable to take the fetus to viability then deliver it (premature that it may be).

Why is this reasonable?

The question of who should then foot the additional medical costs due to the intensive care of a premature infant is not mine and has nothing to do with the moral arguement at hand.

I think it's very relevant.

If you have another example or option of responsibility or can argue that destroying a subject is an act of responsibility to that subject then I would like to hear it as a counter (this is genuine).

As I haven't seen that you've made any argument (rather you've just given blind assertions with silly irrelevant examples), I will choose to do the same. If a fetus is a moral subject that does not mean the mother is morally obligated to provide life for said fetus.