Does the Atheist 'cause' need consistency in it's message ??
For instance, pointing out Jesus was wrong about something, or inconsistent, or contradicting himself (or dad) but realizing we have other atheists claiming Jesus didn't exist at all, so he can't be wrong, inconsistent or contradictory about anything if he didn't exist.
I'm not saying we need a 'lesser' standard than the religiousites, but it seems the 'rules' might of necessity, be different.
Too bad we don't have some stone tablets with . . . LOL, nevermind !!!
For instance, pointing out Jesus was wrong about something, or inconsistent, or contradicting himself (or dad) but realizing we have other atheists claiming Jesus didn't exist at all, so he can't be wrong, inconsistent or contradictory about anything if he didn't exist.
I'm not saying we need a 'lesser' standard than the religiousites, but it seems the 'rules' might of necessity, be different.
Too bad we don't have some stone tablets with . . . LOL, nevermind !!!