Christians. Could you be wrong?

[Esquilax]

The man has clearly preformed scientific experiment on the negative of the photograph, documented every procedure he used, and found that there had to be a light at that position to strike the negative, the only conclusion is the supernatural, because lights just don't hang over peoples heads normally.

But I like the fact that when presented with scientific evidence, you refuse to acknowledge it.

You call that science? Oh, the "only conclusion is the supernatural," there?

Okay class, can we say "the argument from ignorance is not scientific evidence, Huggy"?