Christians. Could you be wrong?

[FatAndFaithless]

Don't you fucking dare, Ken Ham/Ray Comfort/Sye Ten/Matt Slick.

Oh, you are no fun, Ken Ham is great.

---

What scientists have for the 'Big Bang' is way better than eyewitness testimony, which is notoriously unrealiable. They have physical evidence.

If eyewitness testimony contradicts physical evidence at a trial, do you know which one usually 'wins'? If an eyewitness says they saw the defendant speeding away in a particular car, and a mechanic testifies that the car couldn't possibly have been operational at the time; does the eyewitness evidence override the mechanic's testimony, or is it more reasonable to conclude that the witness was mistaken or lying?

What pyhsical eviedence?

Good one.