Personally, I'd say #4 is all you need. At the end of the day, you don't need to reject an undefined number of god claims; you can simply ignore them until someone brings something worth considering to the table.
The problem with #3 is both that
The problem with #3 is both that
- The problem of evil doesn't disprove gods. It just raises uncomfortable questions to people who naively believe in things like omnipotence.
- Arguments about God's moral character never convince apologists. All the conversation does is show you how far they're willing to stretch things to maintain their particular version of theodicy.
