(October 7, 2014 at 9:52 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 7, 2014 at 9:29 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Interesting. The pope says one thing about angels; a random theist on the Internet says another. Both have exactly the same amount of evidence. For all the difference it will make, we might just as well be discussing the mating habits of the yeti.
First catch your yeti - or in this case, angel. Then we can cook it.
Like always you are missing the bigger picture for the quick retort.
The bigger picture being the pope is supposedly the leader among leaders of christianity. Shouldn't the leader among leaders know the rule book backwards and forwards whether or not you specifically want to play this game?
It would be like me getting elected the international president of the dr.who fan club, and then decide to start referring to the good doctor as doc wuuuut. Some sharp tonged Trekkie may say, "Dr. Who's not real what does it matter what you call him, it's all the same in the end.." For the Trekkie, and other Trekkies like him he maybe right, but in the realm where the Good Dr. Is master of space and time, referring to the Good dr. As doc wuut, only shows that I as the president of the dr.who fan club doesnt know the cannon of dr. Who as I should.
The Bible is a collection of books written by men. A group of elected men decided what books to put in the Bible. Your point about the Pope?
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
