(October 14, 2014 at 10:45 pm)whateverist Wrote:(October 14, 2014 at 8:31 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: There are some impressive straw creations in this thread
What else can we do? With so little to go on as to what a god is, or how morals supposedly relate to one, what else do we have to work with but straw? Probably the cleanest stance is .. whatever, wake me up if anyone actually detects a god or the world agrees on an unambiguous description of one. Until then, meh.
Well you'd think that you'd still stick to the evidence of believers, none of whos views are remotely touched upon above. Chad is even vilified for expounding quite accurately. If you're going for a comical characature bearing no relation to the subject, then I think you're bang on target. I could easily summarise the consensus on comparative religions. It seems no one else in this thread besides Chad can. I think that's because you deliberately don't want to. Your bias is that strong. Correct me if I'm wrong.
