(October 15, 2014 at 5:13 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Well you'd think that you'd still stick to the evidence of believers, none of whos views are remotely touched upon above. Chad is even vilified for expounding quite accurately. If you're going for a comical characature bearing no relation to the subject, then I think you're bang on target. I could easily summarise the consensus on comparative religions. It seems no one else in this thread besides Chad can. I think that's because you deliberately don't want to. Your bias is that strong. Correct me if I'm wrong.
You are wrong. The subject of the discussion is the relevance of doctrine to the religion - how central it is, how consistently it is followed or should be followed and how many religious people agree with that. Any evidence and reasoned views on the subject - from believers and non-believers alike are welcome. But don't derail the discussion by bringing in your fantasies. That is what Chad did, for which he was vilified.
