Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"

[Crossless2.0]

Sorry FatandFaithless wrong name it wasn't you it was Esquilax.

Right. Now I'll connect the dots for you (Esquilax can correct me if I misrepresent his point): 'Matthew', the alleged author of the Gospel bearing that name, did not meet Jesus and is not to be confused with an actual flesh-and-blood disciple who may have had that name. In fact, the gospel is only traditionally attributed to the alleged disciple Matthew, presumably to give it the veneer of authority. The gospel was written decades after Jesus' death by an anonymous author with a specific agenda, who relied on (at best) third-hand testimony that had been passed around and changed who knows how many times. So the point is that Jesus' alleged views on marriage as presented are not to be confused with accurately rendered history. Got it?

Point rendered moot. Esquilax got there first.