RE: Ken Ham's ark sinking?
October 28, 2014 at 10:53 pm
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2014 at 12:48 am by Anomalocaris.)
(October 28, 2014 at 10:09 pm)Heywood Wrote: The creationist scientist......
(October 28, 2014 at 10:09 pm)Heywood Wrote: ......should realize that science is looking at the world....and theology is looking at the world. Both are looking at the same thing so there should not be any contradictions between science and theology at all.
Yes. The one finds out shit, and hedges what he says to avoid overreaching. The other makes shit up as he goes and does not recognize any limit to the scope of his bullshit.
There should be no contradiction between them.
The last extra brain cell you have on drippy is dying, woody.
(October 28, 2014 at 10:51 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Seems that Ham...in addition to being a creatard fuckhead...is no financial whiz, either.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-11...uni-credit
Quote:Noah’s Ark Depends on Faith in Default-Plagued Debt: Muni Credit
Quote:Given the default history of unrated municipal debt, investors may have to pray for the success of bonds being sold to build a full-scale replica of Noah’s Ark.
Maybe Kentucky has just figured out a way to shed this leech's dependency on it? Fucking jesus wasn't much of a banker!
I guess he disbelieved what the interest rates say about his ability to remain solvent as much as he disbelieved what Radioactive decay rates say about the age of the earth.
