That atheism is not rationally justified

[Esquilax]

The fine tuning? (One "n" in tuning, btw). For what?

Emergent Complexity

And how did you determine that a universe where emergent complexity could form was the success state that the universe was being driven towards?

You're still just assuming fine tuning to be true, in order to argue for fine tuning. Any more circular logic you want to trot out, or do you want to clear up this basic problem with your argument before adding on a bunch of new details?

Then you followed incorrect reasoning. The existence of a Supreme Being has already been adequately demonstrated, first by Aritotle then by Aquinas, modern hubris not withstanding.

Aquinas, really? Are we talking about the Summa Theologica again? That same argument I debunked the last time you brought it up? And yet... hmm, you argument hasn't changed...