So... essentially William Lane Craig's version of the modal ontological argument, tarted up in some slightly more appealing multiverse science-words?
Sorry, but "sentience existing in another universe," no matter how powerful, does not read as any meaningful concept of god, because it contains none of the other attributes of god. What you've got there is a powerful mind, but not all powerful things are gods, and you don't even know if it's physically possible for energy to self-organize into sentience. All this is merely meaningless speculation based around defending the vaguest, blandest possible concept, before switching it out for "a god," when we both know that's an entirely different kettle of fish.
Sorry, but "sentience existing in another universe," no matter how powerful, does not read as any meaningful concept of god, because it contains none of the other attributes of god. What you've got there is a powerful mind, but not all powerful things are gods, and you don't even know if it's physically possible for energy to self-organize into sentience. All this is merely meaningless speculation based around defending the vaguest, blandest possible concept, before switching it out for "a god," when we both know that's an entirely different kettle of fish.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!