(November 13, 2014 at 12:40 am)Esquilax Wrote:(November 13, 2014 at 12:26 am)Drich Wrote:
So waves and tides... None existent for at least a 10,000 year period? Let me ask is it just localized in just this area or does the moons gravity not create waves and tides for the whole planet?
I know you're enjoying yourself, but do you realize there's a huge range of options between "no tides at all ever," and "tides large enough to heft a whale carcass off of the beach and back into the water"?
Because, as I just pointed out, and you seemed to ignore, when whales beach themselves, usually they're still within contact with the ocean... just never sufficient quantities of it to provide them buoyancy. Despite being buoyant, whales are still heavy creatures that need a lot more water than the tides can provide. If tidal motion was sufficient to carry a whale we wouldn't get beached whales at all.
uhhh, no.
The tides and waves do not have to move whole whales.. Just their bones once the carcass decays.. Now it has gone from thousands of pounds to just tens of lbs or even ounces.. (Because whales werent the only thing they found in tact.)
But that's not the case. There are several dozen piles of fossilized bones that are completely undisturbed. Infact they are is such good order they can tell the whales decomposed upside down. This can only happen one way. That's if the area was completely covered in water, they bones sank to the bottom and were quickly covered in silt.
The problem with that is, according to 'science' that region was out of the water before the triassic period, which means the animals found would not have been in thier 'evolved state' 300 million years ago.
Which leaves a great flood
because delicate/loose bones on the shore could not have survived intact. The fact that there are a few dozen piles of intact fossils like this means they did not die and fossilize on an active shore line.
Which points back to Flood, or no tidal forces what so ever or even waves... On a sea shore.