More Questions for Christians

[Esquilax]

uhhh, no.

The tides and waves do not have to move whole whales.. Just their bones once the carcass decays.. Now it has gone from thousands of pounds to just tens of lbs or even ounces.. (Because whales werent the only thing they found in tact.)

Hey Drich? Whale bones don't float. They're heavy. These things weigh in tonnes, not pounds. You have no idea of the scale of what you're describing.

But that's not the case. There are several dozen piles of fossilized bones that are completely undisturbed. Infact they are is such good order they can tell the whales decomposed upside down. This can only happen one way. That's if the area was completely covered in water, they bones sank to the bottom and were quickly covered in silt.

What is your education in paleontology, that you can say the only way it could happen is yours?

The problem with that is, according to 'science' that region was out of the water before the triassic period, which means the animals found would not have been in thier 'evolved state' 300 million years ago.
Which leaves a great flood

Some of the area was out of the ocean. Do try to keep up.

Also? That's a false dichotomy. Perhaps a giant hurricane blew them all onto the shore. It's no more physically impossible than a worldwide flood. Besides, we know a great flood never occurred because the geological column does not support the idea; evidently the whales got there some other way, but you're not going to be able to point to this single thing, even if we don't know exactly how they got there, and say therefore Noah's flood. Far stronger evidence contradicts that claim, and no matter how strongly you appeal to ignorance, an unknown is not going to trump real, verifiable facts.

because delicate/loose bones on the shore could not have survived intact. The fact that there are a few dozen piles of intact fossils like this means they did not die and fossilize on an active shore line.

Which points back to Flood, or no tidal forces what so ever or even waves... On a sea shore.

Why is it that you think an assertion from you, a man with no education in a relevant field, carries more weight than the evidence based reportage of the actual paleontologists who were there? Who are you to gainsay them?