More Questions for Christians

[dyresand]

Rather than clog up the message with my response, you might consider the following site as "evidence" for the global flood:

http://www.apologeticspress.org/APConten...ticle=1791

blessings,
Harry

That link denies a world-wide flood; it's about a flood of naturally occurring meltwater into Hudson Bay. So, there's that.

---

Evolutionary science is an invalid source of proof since it is based upon theory. And since you reject the Bible as a valid, reliable source of evidence, the question of a global flood cannot be resolved between us; it is a secondary issue. The prime issue is the validity of the Bible. If you wish to discuss that matter, I would be happy to participate.

It's also worth noting that my theological position is that I can only present the evidence, not convince you of its truth. That's a matter between God and you.

A scientific theory is an explanation of evidence. We base theory on fact, not fact on theory.

something the religious cannot understand.