@ Rob
I don't assume it exists. First I discover information, then I assess it. Then I make my choice. When I act upon that choice, I become a Christian.
The logical problem before you is a bare presentation of the God concept in isolation.
I think your burden of proof is non applicable. It's not even the same subject and I can't see how I can even consider it.
My own belief reflects my history. You assume incorrectly that I dismiss other expressions of faith, where I do not. I accept atheism as an expression of exploration too. I don't feel knowledgeable enough to judge who has the best understanding. All I can do is try to do what's right to me.
I've said that logic works on this problem. Can you show me how my logic is wrong? If not, on what grounds are you dismissing it?
I don't assume it exists. First I discover information, then I assess it. Then I make my choice. When I act upon that choice, I become a Christian.
The logical problem before you is a bare presentation of the God concept in isolation.
I think your burden of proof is non applicable. It's not even the same subject and I can't see how I can even consider it.
My own belief reflects my history. You assume incorrectly that I dismiss other expressions of faith, where I do not. I accept atheism as an expression of exploration too. I don't feel knowledgeable enough to judge who has the best understanding. All I can do is try to do what's right to me.
I've said that logic works on this problem. Can you show me how my logic is wrong? If not, on what grounds are you dismissing it?