RE: A Simple Rule
December 29, 2014 at 3:27 pm
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2014 at 3:30 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(December 29, 2014 at 12:51 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:(December 29, 2014 at 12:44 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: Given the situation you described, how is this rule helpful?
Because the rallying cry for the coexist crowd is, "What about the moderates? Your painting with a broad brush."
The new rule makes it clear that while moderates may be nice people, they don't represent what their religion really teaches.
The new rule requires the liberals whose position you take issue with to assume what you want to prove. Convenient, that, but I don't think it will catch on.
(December 29, 2014 at 2:08 pm)robvalue Wrote: I pretty much totally agree with this. Moderates are better people, but are utter failures as far as their religion goes. The radicals are the ones taking it seriously.
If the moderates want to really show it's "nothing to do with them" they need to stop associating with the very book(s) causing the problem. Until they do that, as far as I'm concerned, they are validating it.
How about you make the Christians do it first, and if that turns out well, you can move on to the Muslims?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.