Hey CapnAwesome, I've noticed a pattern in our exchanges:
1. You throw down the gauntlet.
2. I pick it up.
3. You call me names.
4. I ask you if you have a coherent argument to offer.
5. You run away.
If you're not going to engage me with logical arguments or defend your positions with anything coherent, why do you even bother? I'm starting to feel embarrassed for you.
1. You throw down the gauntlet.
2. I pick it up.
3. You call me names.
4. I ask you if you have a coherent argument to offer.
5. You run away.
If you're not going to engage me with logical arguments or defend your positions with anything coherent, why do you even bother? I'm starting to feel embarrassed for you.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
