RE: Toddler shoots his mother dead
January 2, 2015 at 9:04 pm
(This post was last modified: January 2, 2015 at 9:06 pm by Ryantology.)
(January 2, 2015 at 7:47 pm)Chas Wrote: Why two years? What would be involved?
The point is mostly to make gun ownership a lot less convenient than it is. The ease of access to firearms is a huge part of the problem.
Quote:What problem does this solve?
As with the first item, it emphasizes the seriousness of gun ownership by making it more difficult to own guns legally. It also helps ensure that law enforcement has current records of legal firearms and can more easily trace them when used in a crime.
Quote:Convicted felons can't legally possess firearms. The rest is already largely the case in states with licensing.
I don't want even someone with simple assault on their record to have legal access to firearms. It is insane to allow firearms to any person who has demonstrated a willingness to harm others to the point where they have had to be punished by the legal system.
Quote:Firearms are regulated, the debate is about the extent of regulation.
And there are a lot of people who are against regulations of any kind. Those are people who are demonstrably not responsible enough to legally own firearms.
Regulation should ideally be making firearms restricted to all but a tiny minority of the population.
