So the grounds given for dismissing atomic theory, geology, and evolutionary theory, is the opinion of three supposed PhDs that he knows, but can't point to any peer reviewed papers or research, or even give where these people are employed, or their names.
Meanwhile I got a pile of books, lab manuals, experimental notes, and papers of my own to say otherwise. Not to mention the mentioned the masses of peer reviewed literature on the subject. The 50,000 year claim is demonstrably false.
Meanwhile I got a pile of books, lab manuals, experimental notes, and papers of my own to say otherwise. Not to mention the mentioned the masses of peer reviewed literature on the subject. The 50,000 year claim is demonstrably false.