(January 12, 2015 at 5:18 pm)bob96 Wrote:(January 10, 2015 at 8:41 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Ah yes, the argument from ignorance regarding complexity; "I can't think of how this could have happened naturally, therefore it didn't." Sorry, but complexity is not exclusively a sign of design- in fact if you think of it simplicity is more a hallmark of design than complexity- and not knowing how it happened is not evidence for god. Try again.
Tell me this. Which is more complex: the infrastructure, processes and functions operating within New York City, or a single celled bacteria?
The former, though I've no doubt you'll go on to tell me it's the latter, based solely on the fact that you don't understand biology so well.
Either point of which would be entirely moot, given that "it's so complex, and I can't see how that would have happened naturally!" is still only evidence for your ignorance of how it could have happened naturally and not evidence for god.
![Dodgy Dodgy](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!