(January 14, 2015 at 12:10 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(January 14, 2015 at 12:04 pm)Davka Wrote: This is one of the many contradictions that occur when you slap together an anthology of writings from various sources across a thousand-plus years and call them "inspired scripture." Then you're forced to reconcile all those contradictions via hand-waving and pretzel logic.
The NT has a whole bunch of arguments regarding the Law. Jesus says that not even the tiniest Hebrew letter ('jot,' or yod) or diacritic ('tittle') will pass away, and that he came to fulfill the Law (torah). Since the Early Church only began to grow when they stopped trying to convert the Jews and went instead to the Gentiles, they had to deal with this problem somehow.
Gentiles didn't want to keep the Torah. It's a pain in the ass, and you can't eat bacon. Paul actually calls out Peter on the issue at one point, because Peter was hanging out with Gentiles and eating lots of yummy pork when he thought nobody was looking, but would suddenly get all pious and Orthodox Jewish when Paul (or the other Jewish disciples) came around.
So when the time came to decide which books were inspired and which weren't (hint: the ones that gave centralized power to Rome were inspired), the Church Fathers had to try to reconcile the Law that YHWH said was forever and ever with the actual practices of Gentile Christians. the result is an entertaining clusterfuck.
Yeesh. That sounds like it would be a perfect opportunity for people to extract what meaning they wanted the most, and then prop that up as the correct meaning while reaping the benefits of being the head of their own sect--- oh...right.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 6:10 pm
Thread Rating:
You all convinced me, I'm now an Atheist!!!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 19 Guest(s)