RE: 'Drich, which of the millions of different christian denominations goes to Heaven?'
January 18, 2015 at 3:05 am
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2015 at 3:07 am by Ryantology.)
(January 18, 2015 at 1:56 am)Drich Wrote: Not familiar with liberal or conservative interpretations huh?
Well in order for a Fred phelps to get a god hates fags message out of the bible he must cut and paste various passages from all over the bible, and pull them Together with a sermon. The same thing is done with a liberal message. I do things differently. In that I use whole chapters and even books to outline what it is I teach.
You are not different from Fred Phelps in how you come to your conclusions. The only difference is the conclusions you've drawn.
Quote:You truly can't be this dense.
Do you understand the following?
The law is more than a list of do's and don't's the law also includes attonement.
That's been my point all along. You say that you're atoning, but you know you're not being sincere. Someone who is sincere about atoning for not doing the dos, and doing the don'ts, will try with every fiber of their being, to model their behavior in the right way. Someone who is insincere will try to interpret the law such that their behavior doesn't violate it, or that the law itself isn't applicable to them. That is what you do.
Quote:The do's and don't only make up 1/3 of the law. What of the other 2/3s? In your understanding of the bible it does not even seem that your aware of it. In your fail athesis version of the law, what do you do with the parts of the law that deal with repentance and attonement?? You know that parts that Jesus said would never go away?
Would you accept the apology of someone who immediately returned to doing the behavior you didn't want them to do? If they never stopped? If they never had any intention of stopping?
Come off it, you fraud. You can't fool the omniscient if you can't fool me.
