RE: Girl dies of stupid parents
January 25, 2015 at 10:19 am
(This post was last modified: January 25, 2015 at 10:20 am by Chas.)
(January 25, 2015 at 12:00 am)Lek Wrote:(January 24, 2015 at 11:31 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Oh, okay, so it's just sophistry; you want the government to interfere with who can marry who by maintaining the legal status quo, but you don't want the hypocrisy of holding this position in contrast to your view on the other case to negatively affect your argument. Gross.
No. I want to end the government's involvement in marriage and allow for civil unions to provide protection for all persons involved in the contract, including children. I want marriage to be a personal thing.
So it's all about the word 'marriage'? That's your problem?
Quote:We have different views on life and probably will never agree on this. Is it better to live 17 years or 100 years? Is someone who lives to be 100 luckier than one who lives only to be 17? You and I have different worldviews.
Is it ok for a 16-year-old to choose to die?
Is it ok for a 15-year-old to choose to die?
Is it ok for a 14-year-old to choose to die?
Is it ok for a 13-year-old to choose to die?
Is it ok for a 12-year-old to choose to die?
...
Is it ok for a 6-year-old to choose to die?
At what point is it not ok?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.