I won't get into a long winded debate that has the same chance of resolution as creating a perpetual motion machine from a toilet roll.
I'll just say this. As far as I'm concerned:
A child under the age of 16-16 (depending on your local laws) does not have the capacity to choose to deny medical intervention. Once they reach legal adulthood, it's their choice.
The parents of said child should not be allowed to deny a life saving medical procedure such as this. If the government/authorities need to step in, they should.
"Alternative medicine" may be alternative, but it's not medicine.
I'll just say this. As far as I'm concerned:
A child under the age of 16-16 (depending on your local laws) does not have the capacity to choose to deny medical intervention. Once they reach legal adulthood, it's their choice.
The parents of said child should not be allowed to deny a life saving medical procedure such as this. If the government/authorities need to step in, they should.
"Alternative medicine" may be alternative, but it's not medicine.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
